The core idea
Britain’s economy, public services and payment systems are still too often organised around a five-day operating week. That can delay decisions, restrict access and leave productive capacity unused.
Proposal 23 would move Britain towards increasing seven-day operation. Public services would become available across more of the week, while businesses would be encouraged to extend operating days through practical incentives and modern digital infrastructure.
This is an operating model, not a requirement for every person to work seven days. Coverage would be provided through additional employment, staggered teams, predictable rotas and flexible working patterns.
Where the change would apply
Public services
HMRC, DWP, local authorities, licensing, planning and customer services would increasingly operate seven days a week.
Businesses
Employers would be encouraged—not universally compelled—to extend opening and operating patterns where viable.
Digital access
Online public services would support applications, information, payments and case progress throughout the week.
Banking alignment
Extended banking arrangements would connect this policy with the forthcoming weekend-banking proposal.
Designed alongside Policy 25
Policy 26 must be read alongside Policy 25: A Four-Day Working Economy. One changes the standard individual working pattern; the other changes the national operating week.
A shorter standard full-time pattern can coexist with longer organisational availability when different workers and teams cover different parts of the week. Neither policy requires every workplace to adopt an identical rota.
Policy 25: The individual
Moves the standard full-time pattern towards approximately 32 hours across four days where appropriate, with defined working patterns and adequate rest.
Policy 26: The organisation
Uses staggered teams, recruitment, technology and redesigned processes to provide wider organisational coverage.
How seven-day operation would be supported
Business Rate reductions
Targeted reductions could encourage additional operating days where this creates genuine economic activity and better access.
Flexible employment rules
Varied schedules would be enabled while retaining clear protections for rest, predictability, family life and worker consent.
Digital public services
Investment would allow more routine services to be accessed and processed throughout the week.
Extended banking
Business, salary and government payments should not be unnecessarily held over weekends.
Additional employment
Longer organisational coverage may create new roles, shifts and entry points for people seeking work or additional hours.
Sector flexibility
Adoption, staffing and opening patterns would reflect demand, operational need and sector-specific evidence.
Shared time is part of the economy too
A seven-day economy offers potential benefits, but it also creates a serious social-design question. Time outside employment is not purely individual. Family gatherings, team sport, religious worship, community activity and friendship often depend on people being free at the same time.
Parents may face particular difficulty if weekend working is imposed while schools and childcare remain organised around a conventional week. A successful model must expand availability without treating every day as interchangeable or every worker as permanently available.
Synchronised rest
Should two days each week remain the social default for non-employment wherever operationally possible?
Childcare
How would weekend staffing interact with school schedules, affordable childcare and single-parent households?
Family and community
How can rotas protect regular opportunities for families, clubs, faith groups and communities to gather?
Sector necessity
Which services genuinely require continuous coverage, and which only require better access during selected weekend hours?
Workforce safeguards requiring design
Predictable rotas
Workers should receive reasonable notice and should not face constantly changing schedules.
Genuine choice
Weekend work should not become an informal condition imposed without consultation or contractual clarity.
Rest protection
Longer organisational coverage must not weaken daily or weekly rest or encourage unsafe consecutive working.
Fair reward
Pay, premiums, overtime and unsocial-hours arrangements require transparent sector and workplace agreements.
Equality test
The policy must examine unequal effects on carers, disabled workers, families and lower-paid employees.
Pilot and review
Trials should measure access, output, staffing, wellbeing, absence, retention and community effects.
Questions for scrutiny
The direction is defined, but implementation should be shaped by evidence, workers, employers, service users and sector specialists.
- Which public services would benefit most from seven-day availability, and what weekend coverage is actually needed?
- Should two shared non-working days remain the default wherever operationally possible?
- How can weekend work remain voluntary, predictable and fairly rewarded?
- What childcare provision would be required for parents working when schools are closed?
- How should Business Rate reductions be targeted and evaluated?
- What additional staffing would seven-day public services require, and how would it be funded?
- Which services can operate digitally and where must a trained human decision-maker remain available?
- How should productivity, service access, worker wellbeing and community participation be measured together?
- What safeguards are required for small employers, carers, disabled workers, shift workers and people holding more than one job?
- How should Policies 25 and 26 be piloted together before wider implementation?
Core commitment
The intended destination is a more accessible, productive and economically active Britain. Success would mean services available when people need them and organisations operating across more of the week—without making permanent availability the price workers pay for reform.
Source basis: Manifesto 1.1, Part X, Policy 26 / Major Promise 23, read alongside Policy 25 / Major Promise 22 and Policy 27 / Major Promise 24. The proposed safeguards remain open to scrutiny and are not presented as settled implementation rules.
Read. Question. Challenge. Improve.
Manifesto 1.1 is an independent civic project. These proposals are published for scrutiny, discussion and improvement.
Explore all policies